Please note the views and opinions expressed in the this post/blog are strictly personal / confidential and bear no resemblance to any couple living or dead, its NOT meant to hurt anybody’s sentiments, any such act is purely coincidental and (non)intentional.
The so-called advantages of a live-in relationship according to me a.k.a some commonly agreed conveniences of convenient relationships:-
- I am what I am. The biggest attraction, that it safeguards your original personality and lets you be yourself which at time may be missing out of marriages. We often change ourselves 360° in the process of compromising and adjustments. There is nothing wrong in it so long you don’t have a regret later.
- There are no tags attached. No one owes anything to anyone. You don’t have to change your name be it first or last name and maintain/live up to several other associations so formed eg chachi, bhabhi, bahu, etc etc.
- Live-in does not force you anything, be its sex, watching a particular news/sports channel, shopping etc etc. both the genders have more rights and privileges than wat marriage allow or has. Anything done is mostly mutually agreed.
- There are no rules to this game, its mostly played purely for pleasure and fun.
- It gives you the liberty to walk out of the relationship as and when you want, without thinking too much about societal/family emotional attyachaar.
- It restricts the chances of complacency.
- In live-in setups you mostly do things cause you yourself want to do it rather than cause you are obliged/supposed to do it.
However, the flip side:-
- Its still a BIG taboo in India.
- You don’t get rented accommodation on the basis of it.
- It gives too much of liberty to men rather than wimmen.
- Wimmen have more at stake, aka our reputation, emotions etc etc not that men don’t have emotions involved. I am sure most do.
- It gives too much of flexibility. Its easier to walk out of a live in relationship than a matrimony which at time could be a big handicap.
- Nothing comes with life time warranties, but still marriage is a safer option in old age.
- After all why shud boys have all the fun.
Whatever said and done I ll any day give my right feet right toe nail, a chance to live in with a/many gal(s) had I been a guy. But being the so called ‘weaker I think even if I let go of the society there is lot more at stake to enter these convenient relationships.
Tuesday, February 17, 2009
Live-in relationships at its best….
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
6 comments:
Quite a comprehensive post.
Although I am all for the idividuality, assertiveness, no-strings attached nature that live-in relationships shout from rooftop windows, I turn gooey marshmallow after awhile. Dependabilty is the name of the game for me. And the fnal score.
It's quite a heady feeling to know that that one person wants to take all responsibility for you.
Perhaps that is why I'm getting 'knotty.'
Any indication to any incorrigible mushiness will dissolve on its own in the next three seconds. 3,2,1...poof
Plus, no pressure to procreate in a live-in relationship.
Hurray. Long live Playboy bunnies though.
Another - if you feel the grass is always greener on the other side - well what I can say - hop (pun intended) onto the other side!
yeah from live in to matrimony and matrimony to live in... believe me hun once done u ll keep hopping for an entire life... btw touche procreation.... and grass being greener... sadly though no guy wud take the reponsibility of marriage if he is getting all the fun otherwise thats where we loose....
Very interestingly written...
however I do not agree to one of the lines that you wrote in your comment :
"sadly though no guy wud take the reponsibility of marriage if he is getting all the fun otherwise thats where we loose"
om : substitute that 'no' with 'most'
Post a Comment